Something eerily familiar about graphic art, the question of absurd vs logical access is not a simple right vs wrong dichotomy.
I'm not a mathematician, but I'm guessing that this is the kind of image that might be involved.
Mermaids are not all that wacky, and Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus is a book. Odalisques coming across with a confident reminder of the absurdities of art traditions.
How to repair the bridge between pixels and the visitors? Samuel Beckett
How to repair the bridge between visual artists and the viewing public? Serious art produces fish cartoons that people don't need to have.
People are interesting. Abstract art is about as exciting as watching paint dry.
Art people are pinkish.
Goya, The innumerable follies to be found in any civilized society, after this he was humble as a mushroom.
Since desire emerges in the gap between demand and need, it is conceivable that pictures could desire nothing.
W.J.T. Mitchell, What do pictures want ? Graphic art.
To arrive at the edge of the page's knowledge, seek out the most ludicrous ideas, put them on paper together, and have them ask each other the questions they are asking themselves: Are absurd pictures being convicted of the worthlessness of our opinion?